The General Aviation Law Firm, P.C. | Aviation InsuranceClaims Representation

page-template,page-template-full_width,page-template-full_width-php,page,page-id-17110,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode-child-theme-ver-1.0.0,qode-theme-ver-17.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-7.3,vc_responsive

Aviation Insurance
Claims Representation

Aviation insurance policies are not like automobile insurance policies. Unlike the auto policy which covers virtually any claim under any circumstance, aviation policies require strict compliance with many terms and conditions in order for a claim to be paid. Sadly, too many aircraft owners don’t understand this myriad of owner representations and pilot warranties. When one is violated, a claim is usually denied.

As an example, every policy has a section referred to as “Pilot Warranties” where the minimum qualifications for a pilot are listed. In all cases, the pilot has to have a current medical certificate (or the BasicMed equivalent) and a current flight review (aka, BFR). If there is a claim for an event where the PIC was a little as one day past their BFR expiration, most carriers won’t pay. Some are more stringent, requiring that the PIC be current for all aspects of the flight (instrument, night, etc.). The importance of making absolutely sure that no flights are conducted without 100% pilot currency is critical.

Also, unlike “consumer” insurance (i.e., home, auto, health, life) there are significantly less statutory protections for aviation policy holders. Contrary to popular belief, there are virtually no federal laws that govern insurance policies. Insurance is regulated by state laws, and those regulations are usually limited to a carrier’s financial stability and adherence to policy language. The contents of your insurance policy are largely up to the carrier, and therefore it’s critical that pilot and owners read and fully understand the policies limitations and exclusions.

Even when a carrier is willing to pay, they often try to pay less than the full amount needed to repair the owner’s aircraft. For example, the carrier will often require multiple bids from off airport locations, even though the aircraft is grounded and cannot be flown from its current location. Further, some carriers will go out and get their own bids from “low cost” shops just to discourage the owner from having the work done at the best qualified (and more expensive) shop.

Next, watch out for “betterment” clauses. They often read something like this:

The most we will pay for physical damage to your aircraft is the lesser of:

1. its Agreed Value if it is a total loss; or,

2. the costs to repair or replace damage with materials of like kind and quality; including the lowest cost of shipping parts of the aircraft for repair and return the aircraft to the occurrence site or home base, whichever is closer, but minus any previous unrepaired damage or betterment.

“Betterment” means improvement which would add value to your aircraft.

Carriers are notorious for recklessly converting “betterment” into “prorate based on TBO”. As an example, an aircraft has a prop strike which requires an automatic engine teardown. The engine had 1,800 hours toward a 2,000 hour TBO. Same for the prop. Some carriers will try to convince an owner: “You were already at 90% of the useful life of your engine and prop, so we will only pay the other 10%”. Seriously? First, the term “TBO” is merely the manufacturer’s recommended time between overhaul. Under Part 91, TBO is never mandatory as many good engines and props can go 3,000+ hours without an overhaul. Second, the carrier will have a tough time calculating how much the “improvement” actually “added value to the aircraft”. Owners should never lay down for these reductions in payouts. The General Aviation Law Firm, P.C. does not and will not.

As a renter, you probably think you’re covered on the aircraft you rent. That depends on your definition of “covered”. Yes, if you are meet the open pilot warranty on the policy, the carrier must cover you as to claims for damage to the aircraft or claims by third parties. What you don’t know is that after paying out those claims, the carrier can often subrogate against the renter pilot to recoup their losses. Before renting an aircraft, it’s a good idea to carry renters’ insurance to fill in this gap. Better yet, tell the owner you are renting from that you want to be a “named” pilot a “waiver of subrogation” before flying.